[eepro100] eepro100 module does not appear to accept options for two NIC's
Heath Harry
hharry@ascend.com
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 03:02:09 +0000
Hi,
Anyone having trouble pasring options=48 to more than one 82557's ? The
following /etc/conf.modules are configured as follows
[root@framer hharry]# cat /etc/conf.modules
alias eth0 eepro100
options eth0 options=48
alias eth1 eepro100
options eth1 options=48
[root@framer hharry]#
the kernel ring buffer is as follows
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald
Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.10 $
2000/05/31 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and
others
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: eth0: Intel PCI EtherExpress Pro100
82557, 00:D0:B7:7F:00:F8, IRQ 5.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Receiver lock-up bug exists --
enabling work-around.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Board assembly 721383-009, Physical
connectors present: RJ45
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Primary interface chip i82555 PHY
#1.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Forcing 100Mbs full-duplex
operation.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: General self-test: passed.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Internal registers self-test:
passed.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: ROM checksum self-test: passed
(0x04f4518b).
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: eth1: Intel PCI EtherExpress Pro100
82557, 00:D0:B7:7F:00:BD, IRQ 9.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Receiver lock-up bug exists --
enabling work-around.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Board assembly 721383-009, Physical
connectors present: RJ45
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Primary interface chip i82555 PHY
#1.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: General self-test: passed.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: Internal registers self-test:
passed.
Aug 14 14:37:39 localhost kernel: ROM checksum self-test: passed
(0x04f4518b).
It appears as though the eepro100 module will not accept the option set
for eth1 ?
anyone know a way around this problem ?
Regards,
--
Heath Harry <hharry@lucent.com>
Regional Support Specialist
APAC TAC - Netcare Professional Services
Lucent Technologies - Bell Labs Innovations