[eepro100] Unmarked transmit completed status
Donald Becker
becker@scyld.com
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Keith R. Mohlenhoff wrote:
> Anyone know what would cause the CU not to mark the buffer as being
> sent?
Presumably a microcode bug, where the command descriptor update is
dropped by a higher priority receive transfer.
> There is a comment in Mr. Becker's code
> speedo_interrupt function
> "Command unit failed to mark command ... as complete... "
>
> Does this happen often?
Hmmm, writing a driver of your own?
It doesn't happen frequently, but when it does happen it tends to occur
as a burst of missed updates. This may have been fixed with new chip
versions.
Donald Becker becker@scyld.com
Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters
Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993